Marketing No Comments

Thousands grapple to secure homes as England housing crisis bites

LONDON, April 12 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – More than 100,000 households in England could be living in bed and breakfast accommodation and hostels by 2020 due to a critical housing shortage, a study showed on Thursday.

The report by charity group Crisis and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JFR) said current trends indicated the crisis would get worse as local councils battled to find homes for those in need.

It said 78,000 homeless households were in temporary accommodation so far in 2018, with Britain experiencing a housing crisis as homebuilding has declined since the 1970s, driving up property prices faster than wages.

“High housing costs, low pay and insecure work are locking people in poverty restricting their choices: with councils finding it harder to help, more families are being forced into temporary accommodation,” JRF Chief Executive Campbell Robb said in a statement.

Government data shows about one in six properties in England, or 4 million homes, are social housing, a figure that has stagnated for a decade.

The Crisis and JFR report, which is published each year, said 70 percent of local councils said they struggled to find social housing for homeless people last year.

About 89 percent of local authorities surveyed said they had also found it difficult to secure private rented accommodation with more landlords not wanting to rent to people on welfare.

“It is pretty much impossible to access the private rental sector. The cost of doing so is prohibitive and the solution is unsustainable because of the massive disparity between LHA (local housing allowance) rates and market rent,” one council in the Midlands said in the report.

Sleeping on the streets – or rough sleeping – has risen in England for seven consecutive years, according to government figures, with more than 1,000 homeless in London and more than 4,100 nationally, a 134 percent jump since 2010.

Britain’s parliament last year passed the Homelessness Reduction Act, which was designed to ensure that local councils increased obligations towards homeless people.

The government has set an ambitious target of building 300,000 new homes a year by the mid-2020s.

Source: UK Reuters

 

Marketing No Comments

Modular Homes – The Solution To The Housing Crisis?

We continue to face a growing housing crisis and industry experts are divided in their opinion of potential solutions. Modular Housing is one such potential solution. Modular Homes are built in “modules” off site at factories and then transported to and assembled on site. They are placed on existing on-site foundations and their assembly involves clipping the modules together, connection to pre-existing services and the practical completion of exterior and roof structures.

Arguably the biggest advantage with Modular Housing is the speed and efficiency in how it can be delivered. Modular Homes are much quicker to construct in comparison to traditional build homes with some developers offering practical completion on-site in as little as two weeks. The homes can be assembled with relative ease and do not face the same challenges as the traditional housing market such as the shortage of skilled workers (caused by an ageing workforce and an exodus due to Brexit) and the British weather! They are also considered much more cost efficient as the modules are assembled on a production line. Modular Homes are also considered to be much more energy efficient leaving a much smaller carbon footprint. Cheaper, greener homes assembled quickly- all good news, right?

Whether Modular Housing is the solution or part of the solution to the current housing crisis, remains to be seen and there are some challenges. Whilst designs on a production line may seem like a good idea many registered providers and developers have their own requirements and bespoke housing offering and this may require investment in an off-site production facility. Berkeley Homes, which currently builds 4,000 homes a year, is planning to create a factory in Kent where up to 1,000 houses and apartments will be produced annually which will then be craned on to sites. The regulatory position is also far from established. Modular Homes require Building Control sign off but inspectors have to take extra precautions when signing off. Building Regulations continue to change. The evolution and technology seems to be moving much faster than the regulation. This uncertainty poses an issue for the already risk averse finance industry. There is also a misconception that Modular Homes lack the quality of traditional homes due to the “cheap” build cost. It is also unclear whether all new home warranty providers will embrace Modular Housing. Some people have also argued that the UK is not equipped to deal with and deliver Modular Housing unlike some of our European counterparts and we lag behind in terms of production and delivery.

Despite the challenges, there is growing interest in Modular Housing and there is no doubt that prefabrication is undergoing a revival. As well as Berkeley, several other developers including Legal and General and Urban Splash have launched prefab’ homes divisions. Wolverhampton Homes, in partnership with Wolverhampton City Council will be delivering 23,000 Modular Homes as part of a pilot scheme. Also, recently, Tide Construction submitted a planning application for a 546 unit modular high rise in Croydon. Does this mean that the housing industry is changing? It is too early to say but whatever happens, industry professionals will be keeping a keen eye on such pilot schemes.

Source: Mondaq

Marketing No Comments

Forget Brexit – here’s the real reason the UK property market is fragile

What’s ailing the UK property market?

House price growth across the country has slowed to just 2.2%, according to the most recent Nationwide release. That’s a drop in real (after-inflation) terms.

Meanwhile, transaction levels are falling – mortgage approvals dropped to their lowest level in three years in December.

What dread apparition has rattled Britain’s favourite asset class? Could it be possible that you can go wrong with bricks’n’mortar?

“Brexit” is the go-to excuse for those in the property business, much as “unseasonal weather” is the go-to excuse for troubled fashion retailers.

But the reality is that the problems in the UK housing market are a lot bigger than mere Brexit…

The increasing weakness of the UK property market

Last week, London estate agent Foxtons issued yet another set of grim results. The group halved its dividend as profits slid by nearly two-thirds to £6.5m last year. The big hit came from a near-25% drop in property sales activity (although lettings business revenue was down 3%, too).

London has been the hardest hit part of the UK housing market, for sure.  At the high end, discounts on asking prices are at their highest levels since the financial crisis, according to LonRes.

However, according to the most recent survey by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics), activity is slowing across the country.

You can put it down to Brexit; you can put it down to political uncertainty. And both of those might be affecting the higher end of the market, in that the globally mobile super-rich are becoming less willing to buy luxury property in an era where populist governments might be tempted to tax non-portable assets.

But there’s a much more specific reason for house prices to be struggling, and it’s one that isn’t going to change any time soon. It’s the fact that one of the biggest and most powerful purchasing forces in the UK market of the past decade is being squeezed out of the market.

Between changes to buy-to-let taxation and higher levels of stamp duty, becoming a landlord is no longer seen as the sure route to riches it once was. And that is having a big impact on the UK property market.

Landlords are going to keep feeling the squeeze

The additional rate of stamp duty on those buying second homes is one factor putting off would-be landlords. But more important is that the ability for higher-rate taxpayers to offset their mortgage interest payments against their tax bills is being withdrawn in stages. The squeeze began last year, and it will be entirely withdrawn by April 2020.

The upshot is that it’ll be far harder for landlords to make the sums add up. It’s also become harder to secure a mortgage as a buy-to-let landlord, partly as a result of this and partly as a result of generally tighter mortgage lending rules. The figures make it clear that this is already having an effect.

Last year, according to estate agency Countrywide, landlords bought 12.5% of homes sold in the UK – a nine-year low – compared to 14.7% in 2016, and 16.3% in 2015. The biggest drop was in London. Meanwhile, the proportion of landlords buying in cash has been rising sharply.

The abolition of tax relief isn’t the only issue facing landlords. Buy-to-let mortgages are typically interest-only loans. That is great news when interest rates are this low – your monthly payments amount to buttons because you aren’t repaying any of the original capital.

However, it means you feel the pain of rising interest rates much more acutely than anyone with a repayment mortgage: because your entire payment is made up of interest, your bills will go up proportionately more when rates rise.

In short, if rates do rise – even a little – between now and 2020 (which seems very likely at the moment), then landlords are going to be squeezed even harder, between falling tax relief and rising rates.

While some landlords have already woken up to this, human nature means that many others will only realise just how much their property is costing them when they fill in their tax returns in years to come. For some, the resulting figures will come as a nasty shock. (The nice thing is that the government can expect a capital gains tax bonanza, according to accountancy group RSM, which may partly account for the current relative health of the public finances).

The only realistic conclusion is that we’ll see a bigger exodus from the sector and more than likely, the end of the era of the “accidental-turned-permanent landlord”. And the point is, this is not going to change any time soon. Soft Brexit, hard Brexit or no Brexit, this is a structural change.

A house-price crash seems unlikely – but a boom seems even less likely

The good news is that this leaves the field open to potential owner-occupiers. The tricky bit is getting from where we are now to a point where those first-time buyers can actually afford to buy the property.

You see, landlords always had more buying power than first-time buyers. Not only were they generally already property owners and both older and more established, they also enjoyed big tax advantages.

With that gone, competition on the demand side of the property market has fallen. Meanwhile, on the supply side, at the margins, some landlords will be squeezed out of the market – some may even be forced sellers.

What will happen to prices? As long as interest rates stay relatively low (and they could go up a bit from here and probably still not do too much damage), then the idea of a huge crash still seems unlikely.

But equally, there’s little reason to expect prices to rise. Whichever government runs the country for the next ten years or so, it’s clear that increasing housing supply is a major policy goal now. Interest rates can’t get any lower, so it’s hard to see how credit conditions can get any easier. And physical property is going to remain a tempting target for taxation.

In market terms, most of the risk is to the downside. And just to be clear, we’d heartily welcome lower house prices and a more sensible UK housing market. Let’s just hope the adjustment happens gently enough for our financial system to cope.

Source: Money Week

Marketing No Comments

Hammond won’t solve housing crisis without further reforms, Treasury select committee warns

Philip Hammond’s attempt to relieve the housing crisis requires further reforms, according to the Treasury select committee.

Last year’s cut in stamp duty to help first-time buyers get on the housing ladder is likely to increase prices by at least the amount the reduction is intended to save, MPs said.

The influential committee urged borrowing caps on councils to be lifted if the target to build 300,000 new homes a year is to be met.

The chancellor’s move to fix the housing crisis in his autumn budget but the Government will “find it very difficult to meet this ambition” without further action, the committee said.

“Greater measures are needed to increase housing supply,” the report states.

“300,000 homes a year will not be achieved with the current measures. The Government will need to show greater commitment to housing supply to achieve its aspiration and will need to bring forward additional policy measures.”

The committee’s analysis of the Chancellor’s budget called for “unfair” RPI measures used to calculate interest rates on student loans, rail fares and air passenger duty (APD) to be ditched.

MPs also called for the Office for Budget Responsibility to issue a special forecast on the economic impact of Brexit before Parliament votes on crucial exit laws.

Nicky Morgan, who chairs the Treasury committee, said: “The OBR expects a fall in private sector investment due to Brexit-related uncertainty. An agreement between the UK and the EU27 on a ‘standstill’ transitional arrangement is therefore urgent.”

The committee said there “needs to be a step change” in help for first-time buyers.

Councils are limited in how much they can build by a cap on borrowing.

The Chancellor raised the limit for councils in areas of high affordability by £1 billion but it should be abolished, the committee said.

Private housebuilders create around 150,000 homes a year so without significant local authority building, the target will not be reached, it warned. Stamp duty reforms announced in the autumn Budget mean a cut for 95% of all first-time buyers who pay it and no stamp duty at all for 80% of first-time buyers, with savings of up to £5,000.

Forecasts by the OBR found a reduction in stamp duty in isolation will increase the affected first-time buyer house prices by double the reduction.

The committee said the only sustainable way to address housing market affordability is to significantly housing supply, adding: “The autumn budget alone is unlikely to achieve this”.

Morgan said: “The Chancellor pledged to ‘fix the broken housing market’, but the Government is going to find it very difficult to meet this ambition.

“The increase in the cap on borrowing for local authorities to build homes is a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t go far enough.

“The borrowing cap restricts the number of homes that local authorities could deliver. To achieve the Government target of 300,000 new homes per year, the cap should be abolished. The potential of local authorities to build should be unleashed.”

Local Government Association Chairman Lord Porter said: “This is significant recognition of our central argument about the vital role councils must play in solving our housing shortage.

“Our national housing shortage is one of the most pressing issues we face and, as a nation, we have no chance of housing supply meeting demand unless councils can build again.”

Source: iTV

Marketing No Comments

Britain’s broken housing market needs radical solutions

As your report points out, this housing crisis has been obvious for some time, is getting worse and has been largely caused by deliberate political decisions (‘Ordinary’ working families are falling into homelessness trap, 15 December). But many steps could be taken to increase the supply of affordable housing. Here are some: reduce or remove the right-to-buy discount for council houses, increase the term before they can be sold on, and sell them with covenants that prevent their being sold as buy-to-let properties; proceeds of council house sales should go back to councils, which should be allowed to borrow to build replacements; do not introduce right to buy for housing association stock (it damages their economic viability); insist that all privately rented housing is licensed and inspected for habitation fitness; lengthen the term of ensured tenancy; introduce rent controls; more controversially, capital gains higher than a certain percentage on house sales could be taxed and the proceeds used to fund social housing.

If the government truly wished to deal with the housing crisis and its wider social and economic damage – it curbs social mobility for one – they could take steps to do so. But I’m sure they have neither the inclination nor the imagination to do it, largely because it would show up the folly of their neoliberal ideology.
Michael Miller
Sheffield

 Your report (Housing chief resigns over ‘obscene’ bonus, 16 December) tells us a lot about Britain’s broken housing market. When profit is king and venality is rife, which is always, the unregulated free market is incapable of delivering the basic necessity of affordable housing to buy or rent. With their current business model (build executive houses on green spaces for maximum profit), the developers are not part of the solution, but part of the problem. Releasing land for development in the current unregulated climate is a waste of land. Add into the mix the circulating sharks of property speculators, foreign investors and greedy landlords, and all hope for many of affording a place to live vanishes.

In the 50s, I spent the first six years of my life living in a prefabricated house, one of many built to ease the housing crisis. The postwar consensus meant that government thought that the basic needs of its citizens had something to do with running the country. This government needs to get grip on housing, and pronto. Radical ideas and innovative solutions are required. Even though it might run counter to their free-market ideology, more of the same will not do. If UK developers are only interested in building large personal fortunes, then look abroad and regulate.
Keith Howells
Morpeth, Northumberland

 Zoe Williams’ characteristically surgical dissection of what passes for current housing policy (A Christmas story Dickens would struggle to believe, 18 December) omits two largely overlooked issues. In addition to the pitiful numbers and price of what is being built are the facts that space standards are among the lowest in Europe and energy conservation requirements were deliberately reduced by the Tory-Lib Dem coalition.
Jeremy Beecham
Labour, House of Lords

 At the 2010 election housebuilders were major donors to the Conservative party, and in a subsequent budget George Osborne invented help to buy. Then Eric Pickles added his bit of help by letting housebuilders off most of their planning obligations to build affordable housing for rent. With the resultant massive boost to company profits that has followed, it’s perhaps unsurprising that Persimmon shareholders and senior executives now get stratospheric dividends. What’s more surprising is that you don’t highlight the essentially immoral relationships here, which might be seen to lead to political influence and higher corporate and personal reward. Nor is there any evidence that affordable housing has been delivered. An issue on which the public accounts committee should focus its forensic attention?
John Rigby
Much Wenlock, Shropshire

 What do management bonuses mean to the average customer? Persimmon’s CEO will receive a bonus of £110m. Senior staff bonuses will exceed £500m. Persimmon builds approximately 15,000 houses a year. Arguably, therefore, the CEO’s bonus adds at least £7,333 to the price of a house and the senior staff bonuses add £33,333. It is unlikely that the customer would think it money well spent.
Martin Jeffree
Maresfield, East Sussex

 Surely the housebuilding company Persimmon can now afford to run its own help-to-buy scheme.
David Simpson
Datchet, Berkshire

Source: The Guardian

Marketing No Comments

Communities Secretary calls for borrowing to invest in building new homes

A senior Cabinet minister has said the Government should borrow money to invest in hundreds of thousands of new homes in what appears to be a significant shift in Conservative thinking.

Communities Secretary Sajid Javid said ministers should take advantage of record low interest rates to deal with the housing crisis, which is “the biggest barrier to social progress in our country today”.

Asked if Chancellor Philip Hammond was on board with the idea a month away from his Budget, Mr Javid told BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show: “Let’s wait and see what happens in the Budget”.

But his call to borrow more cash to pay for spending on housing and other infrastructure appears to echo Labour’s own “fiscal credibility rule”, which states that the government should not borrow for day-to-day spending but be prepared use it to fund long-term investment.

Asked whether there would be a new housing fund to build homes, Mr Javid said: “We are looking at new investments and there will be announcements.

“I’m sure at the Budget, we’ll be covering housing but what I want to do is make sure that we’re using everything we have available to deal with this housing crisis.

Communities Secretary calls for borrowing to invest in building new homes Commercial Finance Network
Communities Secretary Sajid Javid (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

“And where that means, so for example, that we can sensibly – you borrow more to invest in the infrastructure that leads to more housing – take advantage of some of the record low interest rates that we have, I think we should absolutely be considering that.”

He added: “I would make a distinction between the deficit which needs to come down and that’s vitally important for our economic credibility and we’ve seen some excellent progress, some very good news on that just this week.

“But investing for the future, taking advantage of record low interest rates, can be the right thing if done sensibly and that can help not just with the housing itself but one of the big issues is infrastructure investment that is needed alongside the housing.”

Mr Javid also suggested the Government would not relax protections for the green belt.

Communities Secretary calls for borrowing to invest in building new homes Commercial Finance Network

“I don’t believe that we need to focus on the green belt here, there is lots of brownfield land, and brownfield first has been a policy of ours for a while,” he said.

“There is a lot more that can be done, density is a big issue – if you look at the density of London for example, it won’t surprise your viewers to learn that London has some of the highest levels of demand in the country, the density in London is a lot lower than many other cities, Paris, Berlin, compared to most cities around Europe, so that’s one area where you can expand more.”

At the Conservative Party conference this month, Theresa May pledged to “dedicate” her premiership to fixing Britain’s housing crisis as she announced an extra £2 billion for affordable housing.

An extra 25,000 social homes could be built under the plans outlined by the Prime Minister but her promise was overshadowed by her mishap-strewn conference speech and subsequent Tory infighting, and the party remains under pressure to do more.

Environment Secretary Michael Gove appeared to back Mr Javid’s suggestions, tweeting that he was “v impressive on #Marr”.

Shadow housing secretary John Healey said: “If hot air built homes, ministers would have fixed our housing crisis.

“Any promise of new investment is welcome, but the reality is spending on new affordable homes has been slashed since 2010 so new affordable house building is at a 24-year low.”

Source: BT.com